» News
The Amnesty Memo
from The Corner at The National Review via Mark Levin Show
The Amnesty Memo [Robert VerBruggen]
According to an internal U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services memo going the rounds of Capitol Hill and obtained by National Review, the agency is considering ways in which it could enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action” — that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress.
“This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,” it reads.
Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-place, deferred action and the issuance of Notices to Appear (NTA), and adopting significant process improvements.”
In recent weeks, Sen. Chuck Grassley and others in Congress have been pressing the administration to disavow rumors that a de facto amnesty is in the works, including in a letter to Department of Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano. “Since the senators first wrote to the president more than a month ago, we have not been reassured that the plans are just rumors, and we have every reason to believe that the memo is legitimate,” a Grassley spokesman tells NR. (NR contacted DHS, but a spokesman did not have a comment on the record.)
Many of the memo’s proposals are technical and fine-grained; for example, it suggests clarifying the immigration laws for “unaccompanied minors, and for victims of human trafficking, domestic violence, and other criminal activities.” It also proposes extending the “grace period” H-1B visa holders have between the expiration of their visa and the date they’re expected to leave the country.
With other ideas, however, USCIS is aiming big. Perhaps the most egregious suggestion is to “Increase the Use of Deferred Action.” “Deferred action,” as the memo defines it, “is an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to pursue removal from the U.S. of a particular individual for a specific period of time.” For example, after Hurricane Katrina, the government decided not to remove illegal immigrants who’d been affected by the disaster.
The memo claims that there are no limits to USCIS’s ability to use deferred action, but warns that using this power indiscriminately would be “controversial, not to mention expensive.” The memo suggests using deferred action to exempt “particular groups” from removal — such as the illegal-immigrant high-school graduates who would fall under the DREAM Act (a measure that has been shot down repeatedly in Congress). The memo claims that the DREAM Act would cover “an estimated 50,000” individuals, though as many as 65,000 illegal immigrants graduate high school every year in the U.S.
In the immediate wake of the court decision blocking the Arizona immigration law yesterday, the memo is sure to create controversy — and the sense that the administration is bent on preserving and extending the nation’s de facto amnesty.
“[T]he States can best govern our home concerns and the general government our foreign ones. I wish, therefore … never to see all offices transferred to Washington, where, further withdrawn from the eyes of the people, they may more secretly be bought and sold at market.” –Thomas Jefferson, letter to Judge William Johnson, 1823
Thomas Jefferson quote via Patriot Post




Dauod
July 29th, 2010
bring it dhimmicrats
then you own it
Uncle Al
July 29th, 2010
Are there any Constitutionalists left anywhere? The central govt has one enumerated role in this, and that is in controlling naturalization only – there’s nothing about exercising power over immigration. Amendments IX and X clearly imply that immigration is to be handled elsewhere.
1MadCrackerJack
July 29th, 2010
“Are there any Constitutionalists left anywhere? ”
Uncle Al, it doesn’t seem so.
At least not enough to do any good. I become more and more disgusted with this government each and every day. All of these politicians took an OATH. They are not upholding that OATH. It is way past time for their terms to come to an end. Peacefully or forcefully, it matters not to me.
Angry Pancreas
July 29th, 2010
We need to throw these bitches out. And leave a mark on them when we do it! When these assmonkeys are out of office, including the prezdint, their names and misdeads should be engraved in stone and put into print as to how and why they committed treason. I’m pretty sure there’s a building in the DC area that can house that library. If they can build a mob museum in Vegas, they can build one in DC too.
What an embarrassment they are to our national history.
merle
July 29th, 2010
Grease it up and slip it in to the American people like the medicare czar was appointed during the congress-senate break ( you dont hear anything about that on the news anymore !)
Johnny Freedom
July 30th, 2010
AZ needs to secede, seize all Federal military property in their nation and fight like hell… we all do.
Stirrin the Pitcher
July 30th, 2010
When you believe yourself to be smarter and more enlightened than the general population, and you govern over an apathetic, disengaged and/or uninformed citizenry, its like taking candy from a baby – with or without Constitutional authority.
We have a ruling class (which includes the judiciary) that doesn’t want to upset the great gig they have going, so they are willing to oversee the long-term destruction of this country in order to maintain their short term self-indulgence.
Something radical has to change in our political system. I say next election it’s time for conservatives to have their version Hope and Change we can believe in! Wouldn’t that be poetic justice.
Amnesty by Executive Order: Leaked Memo Explores Obama Options | DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP
July 30th, 2010
[...] MORE: The Amnesty Memo [...]
Salve
July 30th, 2010
1MadCrackerKack! I’m a constitutionalist. The trouble with being a constitutionalist is that the majority of people I speak to don’t even know what I’m talking about. I’ve asked university students if they have ever heard of The Bill of Rights? I have received serious answers like: Are they a new boy group? Where are they playing? What’s their latest single?
This is why we Elena Kagan as a Supreme Court Justice nominee!
Salve