iOwnTheWorld.com

Gay marriage just became the law of the land.

wtf?

+1

Homos are more equal than breeders.

+2

You couldn’t possibly hurt anyone’s feelings. Besides that…obama is supposed to be a swinger..so I am sure that is sensitive material.

+1

Fox News 10-3-08

Now that Fannie Mae is at the epicenter of a financial meltdown that threatens the U.S. economy, some are raising new questions about Frank’s relationship with Herb Moses, who was Fannie’s assistant director for product initiatives. Moses worked at the government-sponsored enterprise from 1991 to 1998, while Frank was on the House Banking Committee, which had jurisdiction over Fannie.

Both Frank and Moses assured the Wall Street Journal in 1992 that they took pains to avoid any conflicts of interest. Critics, however, remain skeptical.

“It’s absolutely a conflict,” said Dan Gainor, vice president of the Business & Media Institute. “He was voting on Fannie Mae at a time when he was involved with a Fannie Mae executive. How is that not germane?

“If this had been his ex-wife and he was Republican, I would bet every penny I have – or at least what’s not in the stock market – that this would be considered germane,” added Gainor, a T. Boone Pickens Fellow. “But everybody wants to avoid it because he’s gay. It’s the quintessential double standard.”

+7

Fur,
“Her being a lesbian should not keep her from becoming a judge. But say her partner is, let’s say, Angela Davis, that would be a very big deal, and it’s information that we would have the right to know about.”

Didn’t stop Obumbles from becoming a presbo, with his good friend, Bill Ayers , hanging in his background!!

+4

I’m not making any point other than that the left cannot claim these questions are out of bounds, for the sake of privacy and sensitivity or decency, or homophobia, or whatever they will claim, in order to confirm stealth candidates.
Who they are, sexually, is relevant, just as it’s relevant in heterosexual marriages. (YES, for the sake of the argument I said “marriages,” WTF. Are you dumb or just pretend to be?)

+2

@BFH: Hold it, are you profiling again you racist! Just what is it in your small profiler’s mind that could possibly make you think that Kagan is a rug muncher??

+3

I can tell you right now that there is no question about it. She is a lesbian and that is exactly the type of freak show that Obama wanted. I watched the rest of America chat for change and I saw right there before my eyes, the American dream burn down to the ground. Obama is now killing all the good things we had going. Read my blog for more @ http://www.gordonsmash.blogspot.com

+1

“How Could Kagan Not Be Asked About Lesbianism?”….same way any liberal cannot be asked about anything of importance!!!! i.e. obama birth certificate…

+6

She’s gotta be. She’s got a face only another androgenous lesbian can love.

+5

I don’t want to know about lesbians who aren’t hot.

+8

Joe’s got it right. If I were to find out Dana Perino and S.E. Cupp were lesbian, now THAT would be some awesome news.

+4

Ms. Kagan, do you have a significant other?
Who is it?
If not, have you had one in the past five years?
Who was it?

That will get the answer without offending the Offensibles.

0

“Dana Perino and S.E. Cupp were lesbian”

no – that would be sort of sad news. I rather hear that they were BI! Then you could always have that one dream that you walk in on Dana and S.E. and they don’t see you at first. They’re so involved with each other that … WTF am I doing? I got confused. I thought this was the “Dear Penthouse” forum. Sorry. Carry on.

+3

Without this process it could be the new way of getting an off the hook radical’s voice to the bench- nominate the partner of the radical.

+1

You are absolutely right, Mr. Pinko. My apologies. Your scenario WAY beats mine.

+4

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: -3

@ Just J

Does that marriage definition include “life partner”?

+3

Eleanor wants Kagan’s phone number.
She’s been looking for a cushiony bottom.

+2

@Just J

So homosexuals get to have it both ways (so to speak)?

They can lobby to have significant partners gain entrance to hospitals as spouses, but this person may never be brought up at confirmation hearings?
Gotcha.

+7

Don’t forget to ask her about cannibalism too.

+2

I feel slimy debating with someone who says “holds no content.” – Like I’m kicking the ass of cripple.

+3

I agree. I don’t think the question even needs asked. Just skip right to the “who is she” part.

Yes, I’m a amatuer profiler, but pretty darn good at it.

+2

Then we shouldn’t ask any other nominee about their spouses or partners or close associates, which, as you know, they do during confirmation hearings.

Homosexuals do not get a free pass on that.
The issue cannot be simultaneously -
our life partners are every bit as important and significant to us than any marriage (a point I agree with, BTW) / don’t ask about my private life, it is insignificant,and/or embarrassing, or not germane, or impolite to ask.

+7

Hold those Flintstone feet to the fire…this is from her in 1995:

“When the Senate ceases to engage nominees in meaningful discussion of legal issues, the confirmation process takes on an air of vacuity and farce.” That critic’s name? Elena Kagan.

+5

Allthing,
“Joe’s got it right. If I were to find out Dana Perino and S.E. Cupp were lesbian, now THAT would be some awesome news.”

If you’re going to dream, DREAM BIG, I always say!

+3

You know how it goes. Gays can shove their lifestyle in your face anytime, anywhere. But just ask Elana that question during the hearings and you will hear an outcry from the libs; “THATS AN INVASION OF HER PRIVACY”!!!

+4

The question will come out in the open. As to whether she answers it or not…

+1

Elena Kagan will be just as good as John Yoo was on executive power.

0

Diann,

“SNAP”

+1

BFH, regarding your point:
“Homosexuals do not get a free pass on that.
The issue cannot be simultaneously -
our life partners are every bit as important and significant to us than any marriage (a point I agree with, BTW) / don’t ask about my private life, it is insignificant,and/or embarrassing, or not germane, or impolite to ask.”

But that would only be true in a world that still made sense, up=up, down=down, etc. and I do not believe we are living in that world anymore.

+2

Is it just coincidence or did y’all purposely put up an add for homosexual getaways at Palm Springs on this post because it’s kinda disturbing. That is one of the last ads I ever thought I would see here.

+1

I saw something tonight that CBS news and the Wa Po outed her today and also that her partner is out and well-known at Harvard.

It’s not her partner that I worry so much about, it’s her feelings, and her empathy, and her intuition, and her heart, and all that other BS that will lead her to a gay type of Roe v. Wade decision. Since that is not the law of the land either.

+3

rebecca, AMEN!

+1

Althing, ads mirror content

+1

Frankly, I’m amazed that anyone can look at this flabby wildebeest and think even remotely of sex.

I imagine even Ms. Kagan’s vibrator hides from her.

+4

even high strung dogs would like her. especially those with long tongues.

i dont think anyone in dc has the balls to bring up her love life. if so the progressive media will have a field day.

if she is a lesbo thank god she wont be able to pro-create.

0

@Fur – of course it should be asked and discussed upon, I was being facitious in my comment because it’s so glaringly obvious.

+1

I’m thinking she’s a virgin. In fact, I’m thinking that her hands cramp up in revulsion when she thinks about masturbating.

+1

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152133

Ask her about socialism, too!

0