» News
Risky Jizzness
Mark Joseph Stern, writing for Slate, cites a recent CDC report stating that unprotected sex between gay men is up 20 percent.
The author decides this is a good opportunity to promote gay marriage between men as a substitute for warning them to use condoms.
This leaves me wondering what is the greater immorality, not criticizing gay men for not using condoms when engaging in their deviant behavior or the willingness to sacrifice them to the ravages of AIDS in order to promote the political agenda of gay marriage?
Read the stupidity here

weeklywonk.newamerica.com



grayscape
December 3rd, 2013
More homo shit. Always something homo this or homo that nowadays and we all just better get on our faces an worship the almighty homo.
I’m a tolerant guy…but now I pretty much want them to all to shut their damn mouths and get back in the closet. Or move to Saudi Arabia.
Lowell
December 3rd, 2013
Buttfuckus interruptus is considered bad form these days.
No thanks
December 3rd, 2013
Slate and gays can pound sand. Don’t care about either.
bitterclinger
December 3rd, 2013
The risky behavior has escalated now that the AIDS epidemic is less visible that it was in the ’80s and ’90s. The only difference is that now, you and I will be footing the bill for these costly drug cocktails.
Dan Ryan Galt
December 3rd, 2013
Thank God (Barry) that we have Obama-Care to cover them if they get Aides.
The irony is that gay men will be required to carry maturity and pediatric care insurance too.
greaterthepete
December 3rd, 2013
“Risky jizzness” sounds like a good title for Chris Matthews interview with Obama
Napolean the boar
December 3rd, 2013
From what I hear, that “forsaking all others” thing usually is only considered a suggestion.
Mohammed's pink swastika
December 3rd, 2013
@ bitterclinger
Are you old enough to remember what HIV was called before it was called AIDS?
It was called GRID.
Gay related immune deficiency.
as the gay community started to “come out of the closet” so to speak and the bisexual community was passing on HIV to their female sexual partners. The people who wanted to forward the gay agenda started shrieking about how it was not a gay related disease because women were now getting GRID.
Passing it on to their husbands and boyfriends married couples we’re now showing up with HIV. That’s when the people trying to forward the gay agenda started screeching to changing the name to AIDS.
I understand HIV is now everyone’s problem. But I think we should go back to calling it GRID. Just to piss off the Liberals.
Heh.
Tony R
December 3rd, 2013
Not to worry; emperor O just declared “we” are going to spend a gazillion dollars to cure aids. So throw away those condoms, boys.
eternal cracker p
December 3rd, 2013
There is obviously no other reason to be a faggot other than cocks and assholes because that’s all they ever talk about.
Bob M.
December 3rd, 2013
Let’s split the difference, and just quarantine them all instead…
AvgDude
December 3rd, 2013
It’s a lot easier to respect gay men who don’t run around whining that the “world” (as they see in their pathetic, self-absorbed, navel gazing existence) doesn’t accept their lifestyle nor do cartwheels over the mainstreaming of what can accurately be called “deviant sexual behavior”.
Most men don’t BF other men. Not interested in it. Never were. Never will be… in spite of the usual gay canard the “everyone is really gay.” Bullshit. The fact is that most people really aren’t gay. And while most are awfully tolerant and don’t going to give gay people a hard time (in spite of all the hoax perpetrated to convince people otherwise), asking people to turn a blind eye to the careless spreading of dangerous disease, AIDS, to the blood supply just so 3% of the population who are definitely not normal can feel normal is getting a pretty damn tiresome. Grow the fuck up and shut the fuck up already. The world doesn’t revolve around sticking things up butts. Get it?
Brian in BC
December 3rd, 2013
And didn’t I read this week that there was a movement afoot to remove the prohibition for homosexuals to donate blood…what could possibly go wrong?
Indiemex
December 4th, 2013
It’s not just AIDS! I’m always wondering why does nobody ever talk about the real fall-out (no pun intended), of anal sex? Loss of sphincter integrity, i.e., pooping ones pants. Or, how about a nice anal fistula, i.e., feces leaking from an extra anal orifice?
There is a reason you don’t see 50 years old men modeling in Dolce and Gabana ads – they don’t look so hot over Depends.
Passing thruthe neighborhoodtoday
December 4th, 2013
And the political agenda of the perpetually adolescent anal alphabet LGBT XYZT et al community is now trying to override state laws that penalize those who expose others to GRID/AIDS/Death/Lifetime on drugs.
Link: http://pjmedia.com/blog/effort-under-way-to-override-state-laws-penalizing-those-who-expose-others-to-hiv/
Jeff
December 4th, 2013
AIDS: A–hole injected death sentence.
Any one who’s primary identity is based on their sexual habits IS mentally ill. Homosexuality is a mental disorder.
Ty Coon
December 4th, 2013
How can you NOT want a condom if you’re sticking it up there? Gross does not fully describe butt sex.
JDavid
December 4th, 2013
Rush read an article last week that said AIDS was up in Greece (imagine that!) because people were trying to get AIDS to get the 900 Euro per month benefit that AIDS patients.
Immortal Fish
December 4th, 2013
Gosh. So redefining marriage will improve fidelity?