» News

Matt Lauer Interviews Al Gore

Home - by BigFurHat - March 9, 2010 - 15:39 UTC - 20 Comments

And surprisingly, he roughs up Al Gore pretty good.

LAUER: Would the campaign against carbon dioxide be occurring without the IPCC reports? I doubt it. Congress is very unlikely to support cap and trade without this carbon dioxide threat which is detailed in the IPCC. You know  many scientists have come forward saying this is flawed science, there is research pointing to dire global consequences, but there is also research pointing in the other direction and there were voices of dissent, and those voices were ignored so the President could make his case.

GORE: Look the science is settled worldwide. It’s agreed upon. You can’t ignore hundreds of reports to account for this warming. 

LAUER:  But agreement is not worldwide. Here’s from, from the University of Blenheim, Professor C. Tuttle. He writes in October of 2009, the top meterological scientist,  James “Spider” Marks, in charge of looking into AGW in Norway looked at a list of 946 peer reviewed reports and found quote, “He couldn’t find with confidence there were any cases of definitive proof of AGW in a single report.”

GORE: Well, that’s one guy, but there were many other…

LAUER: But you said it was worldwide. There was disagreement!

~snip~

Pretty harsh, huh? Well. It didn’t happen. But this did. Can we say in unison, Lauer is an asshat?

LAUER: “Would the Iraq war have occurred without WMD? I doubt it. Congress was very unlikely to have supported the use-of-force resolution without the threat of WMD.” But since the war Karl, you know so many people have come forward saying there was intelligence, there was intelligence pointing that Saddam did have weapons of mass destruction, but there was also intelligence pointing in the other direction and there were voices of dissent, and those voices were ignored so the President could make his case.

ROVE: Look the intelligence was worldwide agreed that he had WMD. That he had ignored 14 resolutions following his surrender after Kuwait to account for his WMD. He had spent 12 years stiffing the international community. We now know because of two international reports by two international weapons inspectors, Kay and Doefler, that he was diverted tens of millions of dollars a year to Oil for, from the Oil for Food program to keep together the necessary dual-use-

LAUER: But agreement was not worldwide. Here’s from, from Bob Woodward’s book State of Denial. He writes in October of 2002, the top intelligence officer, Major General James “Spider” Marks, in charge of looking for WMD in Iraq looked at a list of 946 WMD sites and found quote, “He couldn’t find with confidence there were any weapons of mass destruction or stockpiles at a single site.”

ROVE: Well, that’s one, but there were many intelligence…

LAUER: But you said it was worldwide. There was disagreement!

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2010/03/09/matt-lauer-gets-combative-karl-rove-today#ixzz0hinvZNA6

» 20 Comments

  1. Grayscape

    March 9th, 2010

    What? No felatio? Not even a French kiss?? What happened to the old MSM…. Are they starting to feel guilty for being whores?

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

     
  2. Snowball the Sourpuss

    March 9th, 2010

    Damn! You got me. I was thinking you could knock me over with a feather I was so surprised! But then – BANG! – reality came rushing back and I realized that I was the asshat for thinking Lauer would actualy interview Gore in such a way.

    Silly me.

    Popular: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

     
  3. Grayscape

    March 9th, 2010

    I guess Lauer is still a whore after all….

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

     
  4. Bigun

    March 9th, 2010

    Yup, got to the “snip” and realized, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Thanks for the dork slap, BFH. ;)

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

     
  5. Tammy

    March 9th, 2010

    I don’t understand.
    You mean global warming ISN’T real?

    I just bought new mercury filled light bulbs, people!

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

     
  6. Papadoc

    March 9th, 2010

    It was actually a pretty good interview. Karl can hold his own with anyone, especially a talking head like Lauer. Trouble with these network guys is they fancy themselves as “speaking truth to power”, without realizing that their own prejudices and world-views dictate how they view power. It doesn’t embarass them at all to be scooped by the Enquirer on a blockbuster story that would ruin a Democrat, or to ignore wholesale a huge rally of Tea Partiers in the Capital. But give legs to “Bush lied”, no problem.

    Popular: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

     
  7. Matt

    March 9th, 2010

    I got to “the science is settled” and realized I had been had.
    Bastard.

    Popular: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

     
  8. My2Cents

    March 9th, 2010

    ***GORE: Look the science is settled worldwide. It’s agreed upon.***

    zzzzzzz…

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     
  9. My2Cents

    March 9th, 2010

    ***ROVE: Look the intelligence was worldwide agreed that he had WMD.***

    “The science was settled.” ;-)

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     
  10. had enuf mike

    March 9th, 2010

    doubebag meet douchenozzle !

    enuf said !

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

     
  11. had enuf mike

    March 9th, 2010

    douchebag…

    fur, where is the spellchecker! dammit man !

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

     
  12. rebecca

    March 9th, 2010

    Matt – shouldn’t that be ‘blocking bastard’? Or maybe ‘you random son-of-a-bitch’

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

     
  13. Horrorman18

    March 9th, 2010

    Because he’s Matt Lauer…” Pantload Savant”

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     
  14. McHugeLarge

    March 9th, 2010

    Figures…

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     
  15. Moe Tom

    March 9th, 2010

    tHEY ARE ALL PHUCING WHORES. lAUER, O’REILLY, BECK THE WHOLE PHUCKIN’ LOT. PHUCK EM. I’M ON HINDSEY’S SIDE FROM HERE ON IN. i MAY FEEL DIFFERENT TOMORROW.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

     
  16. Chris

    March 9th, 2010

    We knew saddam had WMD because the US GAVE it to him to fight against iran.
    Just like the afghans are now killing OUR guys with weapons we gave them to fight the russians.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

     
  17. BuckwheatsayHI

    March 9th, 2010

    Why the hell would Rove even waste his time going on Lauer’s show?
    What did he expect, really? How many prospective Today show viewers are going to buy his book, really?
    Rove is the asshat for going on the show in the first place. What is he, a co-dependent media whore?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     
  18. Grayscape

    March 9th, 2010

    What WMD’s did we give Saddam Chris? As for the Afghans…did we give them the Russian weapons they are fighting with too?

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

     
  19. Grayscape

    March 9th, 2010

    @Moe – Too much bacon Vodka?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     
  20. Snowball the Sourpuss

    March 10th, 2010

    Grayscape, his plumbing backed up, got screwed on the bill or something like that. Hope he’s ok…

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

     

» Leave a Reply