» News

Nattering Portman

Home - by - March 17, 2013 - 00:36 America/New_York - 16 Comments

“conservatives are not “blasting” him for “loving his son,” but for abandoning conservative principles.”

American Power -

If libertarian “conservatives” think they’re doing the GOP a favor by pushing the party toward accepting homosexual marriage as a matter of policy, they need to think again.

The leftist media went batsh*t at the news of Sen. Rob Portman coming out for homosexual marriage. This was a yawner to me, so I ignored it at the time. But now here comes the depraved homos at Think Progress with their creepy CPAC video alleging that conservatives are bigots for disagreeing with Sen. Portman’s change of heart.

More

» 16 Comments

  1. AMEN

    March 17th, 2013

    If libertarian “conservatives” think they’re doing the GOP a favor by pushing the party toward accepting homosexual marriage as a matter of policy, they need to think again.

    Im getting sick of moderate republicans in general.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +16

     
  2. mkultra

    March 17th, 2013

    When will libertarians understand that leftists are at war with normalcy and wholesomeness? They won’t stop until every home in america looks like the after party of a gay pride parade.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +12

     
  3. Boobie the Rocket Dog

    March 17th, 2013

    If the son cared as much for the father as father does for the son, he wouldn’t ask to to prostitute himself like taht. Portman was one of us until the kid blackmailed him.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +11

     
  4. Reaganite Republican

    March 17th, 2013

    Government needs to get OUT of the marriage business- two adults of any sort can register a household as legal entity for the purpose of benefits, hospital visitations, agreed inheritance contracts, etc, but let us be married by the church of our own choosing- and being Catholic, I’m confident my church will be defining it the way I see ‘marriage’.

    It’s the only way to handle the issue and get this crap off the GOP’s back, we don’t need it

    Thumb up +9

     
  5. Reticent Rodent

    March 17th, 2013

    To quote someone with more eloquent writing skils than myself

    “They cannot understand as yet that we are not fighting a political party but a sect of murderers of all contemporary spiritual culture.”

    For example, we have nothing in common with those who sincerely praise Ernesto “che” Guevara (see http://www.therealcuba.com/MurderedbyChe.htm )

    The purpose of gay “marriage”, so-called marriage equality or whatever other obsequious name they wish to give this issue is NOT equality, fairness or some desire to help a deviant 1%-3% portion of the population that. It’s the further destruction of western civilization and Christianity. The individual motivation of the sub-groups may differ but the overall end state of this is not.

    They are not “just like us” but with a differing viewpoint.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +10

     
  6. Reicent Rodent

    March 17th, 2013

    Almost forgot, the quote was from Roman von Ungern-Sternberg an anti-Bolshevik Russian General.

    Thumb up +6

     
  7. mcfartus

    March 17th, 2013

    Its St Patricks Day, can we please not discuss homos today?

    Thumb up +4

     
  8. Boobie the Rocket Dog

    March 17th, 2013

     
  9. bubba

    March 17th, 2013

    @rr, thanks for the link.

    Thumb up +2

     
  10. Dr. Tar

    March 17th, 2013

    After reading those tweets from the left I find my self agreeing with them for once. Funny though, I wouldn’t put my disappointment in Portman in quite those obscene terms. Leave to the left to drop f-bombs all over the place.

    Thumb up +1

     
  11. DaveVA

    March 17th, 2013

    @Bobbie, that is funny stuff. Never seen that show before.

    Thumb up +2

     
  12. Carlos The Jackal

    March 17th, 2013

    Reticent Rodent, you’re absolutely right.
    In the same way, the anti gun bunch are not just about getting rid of guns, they’re intent on destroying our legacy and culture of firearms.

    Thumb up +3

     
  13. bubba

    March 17th, 2013

    bubba says that Portman abandoned his principles, that is if he had any to begin with.

    Thumb up +3

     
  14. Maudie N Mandeville

    March 17th, 2013

    Mr. and Mrs. Portman are so happy for him.

    Anal sex is considered one of the highest risk sexual behaviors for both men and women.

    The high-risk nature of anal sex is simple: the rectum was not designed for sexual intercourse. Compared to the vagina, rectal tissue is much more vulnerable to tearing during intercourse and the larger surface area of the rectum/colon provides more opportunity for viral penetration and infection.

    Physical injuries that can result from anal sex include: bleeding, lacerations, and perforations of the rectum and/or anal sphincter muscles. Once this damage occurs, open sores, hemorrhoids, and anal warts can result. Anal sex (as well as oral/anal contact) also exposes individuals to fecal matter, which can lead to a number of gastrointestinal infections, such as proctitis, enteritis, and proctocolitis.

    http://www.ncfamily.org/FNC/0707S3.html

    Thumb up +1

     
  15. Stranded in Sonoma

    March 17th, 2013

    @Maudie — You’re a homophobe for saying that. How dare you tell the truth to the practitioners of fecal sex?

    Thumb up +5

     
  16. Corny

    March 17th, 2013

    I’m no homophobe, but I have spent some time studying how many there are. Considerable scientific research puts that number at about 2.3% of the population. So why do we devote about a third of politics talking about 2% of the population?

    Thumb up +1