» News

FULL VIDEO: Dan Bongino debates Maryland gun control advocate on local news show

Home - by - February 26, 2013 - 07:16 America/New_York - 5 Comments

THE RIGHT SCOOP

 

Dan Bongino took on Vincent DeMarco of Marylanders to Prevent Gun Violence this morning
in a debate moderated by Bruce Depuyt with News Talk. You can watch the full debate below:

http://www.therightscoop.com/full-video-dan-bongino-debates-maryland-gun-control-advocate-on-local-news-show/

 

» 5 Comments

  1. [...] iOwnTheWorld.com – Dan Bongino took on Vincent DeMarco of Marylanders to Prevent Gun Violence this morning in a debate moderated by Bruce Depuyt with News Talk. You can watch the full debate here… [...]

    Thumb up 0

     
  2. Bayouwulf

    February 26th, 2013

    For some strange reason or another, I could spot the difference between the who was pro-gun and anti-gun before anyone said a word. Anyone else care to take the “Bayouwulf” challenge and spot the progtard prior to introductions. (okay, snark function-OFF)

    As with all anti-gunners, they trot out things like “reasonable” and “common sense” laws as well as phrases like “we aren’t going to take anyones guns from them” and “most Americans support these changes”

    Believe not a word of it. It’s all about muddying up the waters and misleading the sheeple with misinformation. Personally, I think DeMarco and his ilke are ALL frakking cylons.

    Thumb up +2

     
  3. bettycooper

    February 26th, 2013

    Well done Dan!

    Thumb up +1

     
  4. Billy Fuster

    February 26th, 2013

    This is more bullshit via framing the gun debate as one of self-defense against common criminals. Why is the elephant in the room being ignored? THE SECOND AMENDMENT EXISTS AS A PROTECTION AGAINST TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT. SOCIALIST government criminals have killed over ONE HUNDRED million people in the last century. We have a SOCIALIST CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT. End of debate.

    Thumb up +4

     
  5. MM

    February 26th, 2013

    Amen Billy. That’s exactly what I was going to write.

    It’s the SOP for debating REgressives-avoid the central issue and get you in the tall grass arguing something else where their bullshit bullet points seem to make sense.

    I will never register nor surrender my weapons because you’re as good as dead anyway being defenseless.

    Don’t think so? Ask the 200 MILLION+ people that were murdered by their government in the past century that were first disarmed. Think about it this way, had 1/4 or 1/5 or1/10 of those murder victims had been able to take one of the jack boots with them, that shit would have been stopped cold.

    The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with self protection or hunting-we started the damn Revolutionary War when the British passed laws regulating gunpowder and gun sales and then attempted gun confiscation. They knew that once disarmed, they would never be another other than pee-ons.

    Thumb up +2