» News

Questions Surround First Lady’s Portrait

Home - by - February 22, 2013 - 19:30 America/New_York - 7 Comments


WASHINGTON (BHN) – The release Wednesday of Michelle Obama’s second term portrait by the White House has brought a flurry of questions concerning its accuracy.

Many point to the First Lady’s more feminine arms, apparent breasts, and “less Klingon-like” forehead as evidence the photo was altered.

Spokesman Jay Carney admitted that “normal” airbrushing was done to the photo, but nothing more. Unfortunately his statement was later found to be less than truthful when the original photo was leaked by unidentified sources inside the administration

MORE  http://peacemoonbeam.typepad.com/bighairynews/2013/02/questions-surround-first-ladys-portrait.html


  1. Kenny Sullivan

    February 22nd, 2013

    OK, so why didn’t they ‘brush out’ her man hands?

    Thumb up +4

  2. more like

    February 22nd, 2013

    A nine inch paint roller.

    Thumb up +3

  3. Mary Jane Anklestraps

    February 22nd, 2013

    I have questions about her being a lady.

    Thumb up +8

  4. Saxindacity

    February 22nd, 2013

    B-I-C-H… Bitch :D :)

    (I won the spelling bee in 6th grade)

    Thumb up +3

  5. Mary Jane Anklestraps

    February 22nd, 2013

    “…apparent breasts,”
    LOL I missed that part. lol

    Thumb up +4

  6. Stranded in Sonoma

    February 22nd, 2013

    … and “less Klingon-like” forehead…

    I never noticed before!

    Thumb up +2

  7. 99th Squad Leader

    February 22nd, 2013

    Whoopi Goldberg’s long lost sister?

    Thumb up +1