iOwnTheWorld.com

I see this all the time. I have teacher friends and also work in academia. It surprises me how the liberals feel totally free to express their talking points, but if I counter their group-speak they are shocked. During work, while at lunch, I like to challenge their talking points. But I do it judicially – nothing belligerent, just what if…

Don’t know if I’ll ever change minds, but I will keep trying.

+8

@norm: I call ‘em “Pussy’s”

+2

I know the cheap plastic chair he grabbed at 3:20 is worth about $100 to $150 in today’s market.

+4

Or rather fiberglass chair. But you won’t know which is right without a group.

+4

this is horrible.

(had to say that so i wouldn’t conform)

+5

what loretta said.

the homo drug addled kenyan ghetto thug won by fraud. plain and simple.

until that changes we are toast.

+7

cAss Sunstein wrote about this principle and advocates h use of “choice architects” to “nudge” people into the desired decision. Given his documented desire to control the proles, he’s probably already using this idea in social settings and on the Internet.

The Rand corp also wrote about this under the topic of “reverse Delphi technique” which has been used by Agenda 21 folks in meetings where they put many plants in the audience in order to push people into making desired decisions.

I agree with Loretta, voting booths are private and there was quite a bit of brazen fraud in the last election.

+2

the old herd mentality.

herd of sheeple.

+1

IMO, This is why it’s important to teach them to stand up for what they know is right.

Your voice may give inspiration and confidence where there was none before.

Be a leader but be ready to defend your stance honestly. Let the chips fall where they may.

Like my very boring but memorable Algebra II teacher said: “Math problems are not up to a vote. Sometimes you may be the only person in the room with the right answer.”

+5

Yes @Loretta, it is true that 0bama and the democrats cheated. But since that is not the accepted position of the majority of the press, you can’t say it in public without fear of ostracization.

As for the “secret ballot” test dropping the group conformity by two-thirds, why do you think the liberals want union voting to do away with secret ballots? Not peer pressure but FEAR pressure. To keep the union from falling apart.

+3

Didn’t see the video but because I am 429 years old, I do know that the most basic of human needs is inclusion.

Remember the black minister who said he would have to reevaluate his traditional stance on homosexuality because Obama said its OK?

It will take the AntiChrist about oh say .5 gigasecond to line up 98% of the world’s population in alphabetical order.

+3

Because Santa Kenyan promised all things to everyone (save for EEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIL bitter, whitey, Bible & gun clingers )?

I hardly need to waste 4 minutes watching some libtard university experiment from the 1970′s to know THAT…

+2

The Emperor HAS NO CLOTHES! There. i said it no matter what the Obama-bots think.

+1

I’ve made some enemies, but screw everybody if they’re wrong. If the flow goes down the toilet, don’t go with the flow.

+1

Hmm, really strange think happened to me on the way to iOTW!

0

Could swore I had a post here earlier today… Hmm, WTF?

0

I’ve said it before and I’ll probably say it again.

“WHAT IF” we began to use the left’s tactics against them?

I’m talking about the mind games, the blackmail, the intimidation, the NLP speeches, the cheating, the threats, the corruption, the bribes, the fraud, all of it. Even the “accidents” that aren’t really accidents.

What if the Right fought dirty?

How often do people win a rigged fight in the REAL world?

If we believe that the fight is rigged, that obama did all of the above to win 2012, what are we going to do about it in 2014 and 2016? Roll over for Biff like Marty McFly’s dad in the first part of Back To the Future I?

Because that’s what we looked like last fall.

Either use the same weapons or change the rules altogether.

0