I forgot to add that DHS calls them “personal defense weapons” and says the “select-fire” weapons are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.”
+8
Bad Brad
January 27th, 2013
Nomenclature is real important when dealing with the loons. And it’s just not the AR platform they are focusing on. We should refer to these weapons from this point forward as “Tactical Weapons”.
+2
tysmwest
January 27th, 2013
Can someone explain why DHS needs enought assault rifles for about Four/Five Combat Infantry brigades figuring about 1500 fighing men in a brigae…and that is a high count……
+3
OzarksAbe
January 27th, 2013
Sometimes, albeit by accident, this administration speaks the truth. An AR is a PDW, personal defense weapon.
In the interview with Newt, Pursem Organ established that the fella in Aurora used an assault rifle that could shoot 100 bullets in a min. There after in the conversation every time he referred to the assault weapon he stated that it could ” kill a hundred people in a minute”. Every time he used that exact phrasing.
0
Tony R
January 27th, 2013
Typical stupid federal government. They wait until the price of an AR has doubled before placing their order.
thirdtwin
January 27th, 2013
It is not an AR, but Piers really wants all guns gone:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/25/army-veteran-scares-off-burglar-with-gun/
Menderman
January 27th, 2013
If cops need 30 round AR-15′s “Protect and Serve” us, we need them to protect ourselves from those same bad guys.
Claudia
January 27th, 2013
This just in:
Clinical Studies show that two AR15s in the bedroom aid in a fully rested night’s sleep.
Menderman
January 27th, 2013
Homeland Security seeking to purchase 7,000 ‘assault rifles’
January 26, 2013
By: Joe Newby
http://www.examiner.com/article/homeland-security-seeking-to-purchase-7-000-assault-rifles
cfm990
January 27th, 2013
I do believe Mr Morgan is an AR…. Anglican Retard.
Menderman
January 27th, 2013
I forgot to add that DHS calls them “personal defense weapons” and says the “select-fire” weapons are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.”
Bad Brad
January 27th, 2013
Nomenclature is real important when dealing with the loons. And it’s just not the AR platform they are focusing on. We should refer to these weapons from this point forward as “Tactical Weapons”.
tysmwest
January 27th, 2013
Can someone explain why DHS needs enought assault rifles for about Four/Five Combat Infantry brigades figuring about 1500 fighing men in a brigae…and that is a high count……
OzarksAbe
January 27th, 2013
Sometimes, albeit by accident, this administration speaks the truth. An AR is a PDW, personal defense weapon.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/26/if-assault-weapons-are-bad-why-does-the-dhs-want-to-buy-7000-of-them-for-personal-defense/
LadyGun12
January 27th, 2013
@Claudia, I’d settle for one. Mine is being custom made as we speak. I only hope I get it before any kind of ban goes into effect.
Blink
January 27th, 2013
This one is an AR15 Story.
NO shots fired, indeed no rounds were yet loaded. But the bad guys knowing the guy often has a 30 round mag, decided it was better to be elsewhere.
http://www.13wham.com/news/local/story/Homeowners-Scare-Off-Burglars/7yaLSXAvCUGBkwgAZpGO4g.cspx .
jbinnout
January 27th, 2013
In the interview with Newt, Pursem Organ established that the fella in Aurora used an assault rifle that could shoot 100 bullets in a min. There after in the conversation every time he referred to the assault weapon he stated that it could ” kill a hundred people in a minute”. Every time he used that exact phrasing.
Tony R
January 27th, 2013
Typical stupid federal government. They wait until the price of an AR has doubled before placing their order.