» News

You Can Actually Smell the Stupid on Them

Home - by - January 9, 2013 - 18:00 America/New_York - 32 Comments

sameshit

» 32 Comments

  1. old_oaks

    January 9th, 2013

    I’m a little lost, maybe it’s the difference between the Celica and Nissan Pulsar, but both rifles have detachable magazines and shoot semi-auto.

    Is this implying my AR is a riced out M1?

    Thumb up +3

     
  2. sacwarrior

    January 9th, 2013

    same thing just looks different or more intimidating (no)

    Thumb up +5

     
  3. Kairn

    January 9th, 2013

    So when are the progtards going to take our right away to own super dooper pimped out razz matazz cars? ;-)

    Thumb up +5

     
  4. Left Coast Dan

    January 9th, 2013

    The Kill-o-Zap is a weapon first appearing in the novel The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

    The designer of the gun had clearly not been instructed to beat about the bush. ‘Make it evil,’ he’d been told. ‘Make it totally clear that this gun has a right end and a wrong end. Make it totally clear to anyone standing at the wrong end that things are going badly for them. If that means sticking all sort of spikes and prongs and blackened bits all over it then so be it. This is not a gun for hanging over the fireplace or sticking in the umbrella stand, it is a gun for going out and making people miserable with.’

    Thumb up +6

     
  5. Death_By_Farts

    January 9th, 2013

    Vehicles like this should be required to have a permanent bumpersticker that says “Hit Me, I’m a liberal”

    Thumb up +5

     
  6. Czar of Defenestration

    January 9th, 2013

    I don’t get it.

    Do you mean:

    “Once you go black low-brow turbo,
    you’ll never go back.”?

    Thumb up +2

     
  7. Bad Brad

    January 9th, 2013

    In both cases, there’s no replacement for displacement.

    Thumb up +6

     
  8. Joe "shitforbrains Biden

    January 9th, 2013

    I get it…. Wood good, plastic bad. Ban all guns with plastic. Plastic kills. Ban plastic. Save children. Toys are plastic. Ban toys. Ban playing. Ban schools. Ban children.

    Thumb up +6

     
  9. Just A Vet

    January 9th, 2013

    Personally I’ll take the M-14, you can keep the other! ;-)

    Thumb up +7

     
  10. Eric

    January 9th, 2013

    The two “weapons” at the bottom, while used in actual combat situations, will kill fewer people than the two “weapons” at the top.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +14

     
  11. old_oaks

    January 9th, 2013

    Feet Per Second

    2800 v. 3100 or less with shorter barrel carbuerturbonomalizer.

    Thumb up +4

     
  12. CrustyB

    January 9th, 2013

    Um…if I get killed with the one on the left I’ll be more dead than if I get killed with the one on the right?

    Thumb up +8

     
  13. Unslung Hero

    January 9th, 2013

    I don’t discriminate…….I got one of each!!!!

    Thumb up +9

     
  14. J Frank Parnell

    January 9th, 2013

    They all get you where you want to go, all are legal, all four represent freedom. But the pimpwagon and the lib mobile kill tens of thousands more Americans per year than the magazine-fed, semiautomatic rifles.

    Thumb up +6

     
  15. Whom

    January 9th, 2013

    Helga (looking at the riced out Nissan): “Vat does that do??”

    “It sucks in air.”

    Helga: “It’s defintely sucking!”

    Thumb up +5

     
  16. D B Cooper

    January 9th, 2013

    @ Just A Vet You sir just won a c-rat can of ham
    and lima beans for your correct answer.

    I don’t want no teenage queen…………………

    Thumb up 0

     
  17. Sidekick

    January 9th, 2013

    Scary stuff must be banned. It is a law or something

    Thumb up +4

     
  18. cfm990

    January 9th, 2013

    @ Vet & Cooper. Amen bros, I’ll take the Garand platform over the AR any day.
    My motto? Gimme a Mini.

    Thumb up +4

     
  19. Unruly Refugee

    January 9th, 2013

    I wish they would ban those loud taco wagons and make the owners ride a quiet little moped.

    Thumb up +4

     
  20. BigFurHat

    January 9th, 2013

    I’m a bit disappointed.

    What this means is, what the gubberment calls an “assault weapon” is a rifle dressed up like something it’s not in order to make posers feel like they’re running around with a military rifle.
    Just like the posers do with after-market kits to an otherwise ordinary car. It doesn’t make it a race car, just like the Johnny Nam rifle isn’t an automatic. It’s a single shot rifle.

    Thumb up +5

     
  21. TN Tuxedo

    January 9th, 2013

    Moral of the Story:

    You can epoxy and bondo as much ghetto bling on the outside of anything in this world, but it won’t improve it one iota.

    Crap is crap, regardless of packaging.

    I don’t know what that has to do with the M-14, though. It’s degrees of magnitude superior to the M-16.

    Thumb up +4

     
  22. BigFurHat

    January 9th, 2013

    It’s still a rifle.
    The blinged out car is still a car, not a rocket ship.
    And the dressed up rifle is still a single shot rifle, not an “automatic killing MACHINE.”

    Okay, the graphic didn’t land.

    Thumb up +4

     
  23. old_oaks

    January 9th, 2013

    I caught it BFH in that I asked if you were implying my AR is a “riced up” M1.

    But.

    After looking closer at the tiny pics, the one on the right may in fact be an M14, I dunno.

    Either way, M1/14, or M4/16/AR15 the main difference is FULL AUTOMATIC in the two variants and what actually defines which is an “assault rifle.”

    I think you just caught us gun nuts off guard, because aside from looks, caliber, some functional attributes and feet per second an M1/4 and M4/16/AR15 are pretty much the same.

    Thumb up 0

     
  24. old_oaks

    January 9th, 2013

    BFH – There are more real life graphics that might land better. Like the difference between a Ruger 10/22 and a Red Jacket ZK-22.

    The latter would make any progturd who shot a 10/22 in summer camp wet their pants… But it is still a freaking 10/22!

    Thumb up 0

     
  25. Geoff C. The Saltine

    January 9th, 2013

    Mr. Hat I got it. You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig.

    Thumb up +4

     
  26. Cracker Baby

    January 9th, 2013

    @ old oaks:

    Get your specs checked!

    @ Mr. Hat

    Your graphic does not fail, but to imply that only posers would own AR style rifles does ;)

    Thumb up +2

     
  27. Bad Brad

    January 9th, 2013

    BFH, The graphic landed.

    There’s no replacement for displacement.

    Rice rockets really identical.

    AR-.223, M14-.308. I like, Just A Vet, will take the .308. Much better round, much better displacement.

    Thumb up 0

     
  28. BigFurHat

    January 9th, 2013

    The idea still is -

    these politicians are either ignorantly or purposely pushing the narrative that these scary looking “semi-automatic “assault rifles” are a different animal than any other semi-automatic rifle that doesn’t look that scary.

    The parallel being, the car on the left isn’t any different than the car on the right. It just “looks badass.”

    You can get all pedantic with extreme limited perspective and get all down in the weeds about muzzle velocity, and comparing the rifles for which is “better”, yada. It’s not the point.
    It’s a rifle that fires one shot per pull.
    The public doesn’t know that.
    They think these are machine guns. They have no idea that the government is getting ready to ban single shot rifles that look like machine guns.

    Thumb up +2

     
  29. Bad Brad

    January 9th, 2013

    Aaah, I got you, Graphics not landed. And you are correct. What your talking about is the usual liberal bull shit. Symbolism. Get the marching band and the cheer leader out. Gun owners and our freedom are going to get hurt, no question. They will pick the least effect weapons to ban, in my opinion.

    Thumb up +1

     
  30. old_oaks

    January 9th, 2013

    It’s a matter of reality v. TV, marksmanship is too technical for the common Appleidiot.

    Thumb up +1

     
  31. RickeyG

    January 10th, 2013

    If it makes you feel better, Fur, I got it. (Although I suggest reversing the images L-R)

    Unfortunately, libs will now be calling for the banning of assault cars.

    Thumb up 0

     
  32. Big Boss Ogg

    January 10th, 2013

    Man, what I wouldn’t give for my step dad’s old M-1. He sold it about 22 years ago, while I was out of town on extended stay somewhere, and I didn’t know ’til I got back.

    It was a jewel, I’d have paid 3 times the $150 he got for it from the anonymous guy who answered the ad he took out.

    Thumb up 0