» News
These Go To 11
This is hilarious, until you consider that these are the dogfarts that are shaping our society, and they are clueless.
Bob thinks Adam Lanza came into that school with a machine gun and mowed down the kids in a continuous stream of bullets with one pull of the trigger. And this twatwaffle is supporting Feinstein’s ban with zero information. He has no idea that Lanza had to keep pulling the trigger, just like on a MUSKET!
Again, Lanza could have killed the same amount of kids had he walked in with a duffle bag filled with fully loaded antique revolvers, or a bag of hammers. Or, should I say, a bag of Bob Schieffers.
grayscape
December 27th, 2012
Progtards aren’t called progtard for nothing. They are too arrogant to realize how stupid they are.
It’s similar to how some animals are too primitive to recognize themselves in a mirror.
norman einstein
December 27th, 2012
Bob Schieffer should have been put on an ice floe years ago!
Love his comeback: “But these are dangerous.”
Bobby, a freaking chopstick is dangerous in the wrong hands.
grayscape
December 27th, 2012
What’s dangerous is ignorant smug libs trying to conduct an interview about something they know less than zero.
Xavier
December 27th, 2012
I sense the birth of a new meme, “But These Are Dangerous”.
MNP
December 27th, 2012
@norman einstein, that reminds me of the Liddy Pencil Kill.
KF
December 27th, 2012
Not only are they morons but they believe that humanity can be perfected via endless regulation, social engineering, behavior modification or drugs. Just don’t you dare mention ANYTHING to do with Judeo-Christianity that managed to keep society stable for thousands of years. They know better now
Moe Tom
December 27th, 2012
Norman You got me. “But these are dangerous.” Yeah Bob, dangerous, so is slipping on ice.
Wyatt, Insensitive Progressive Jerk
December 27th, 2012
Spengler: killed two fire fighters, and was an ex-felon who had previously murdered a relative.
Lanza: 20 year old who used his mother’s weapons to murder school kids.
Columbine killers: Purchased guns illegally (they were under age), and actually intended to kill more people with homemade bombs.
So what do these things have in common? Existing gun laws – designed to keep weapons out of the hands of these people – failed. Background checks, FOIA identification, gun registration – none of this would have worked with any of these folks because in two cases (Columbine and Spengler), they could not purchase weapons and in the third case (Lanza), the guns belonged to his mother.
It is obvious Bob Scheiffer has no clue as to what he is talking about. Banning certain types of guns or magazines, or requiring registration will likely have no more effect than prohibition had on the availability of alcohol or the drug wars had on the availability of marijuana.
Xavier
December 27th, 2012
@Wyatt
All true, and as you undoubtedly know, another massacre will occur using weapons allowed under the new edict, which will be used to further restrict gun rights for law abiding citizens. Repeat.
They don’t need a Hail Mary pass as long as they keep getting 3-4 yards every play.
CrustyB
December 27th, 2012
I saw an article in Vanity Fair or some similar rag that referred to a .9mm handgun. You’d think that even without a knowledge of firearms your basic understanding of measurements would tell the author, the proofreader and the editor that this doesn’t look right.
old_oaks
December 27th, 2012
Crusty, that’s because a .223 is not a 5.56×45, the media is completely lost!
Blink
December 27th, 2012
If they weren’t dangerous. What good would they be?
I’d hate to think about what may have happened to the teenager and his younger sister in Texas if the AR-15 wasn’t dangerous – To burglars – who are down range.
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=162514
Mr.Gates
December 27th, 2012
Guns aren’t as dangerous as stupidity Bob.
Mr.Gates
December 27th, 2012
Would it be dangerous to let a convicted murderer out of prison ?