» News

High Level Gun Control Argument From Piers Morgan

Home - by - December 19, 2012 - 12:06 America/New_York - 24 Comments

This is like an argument with Brady. No, not Jim Brady… Cindy.


  1. Jerry Manderin

    December 19th, 2012

    It was so delightful to see this British twit get his bad teeth clocked and glocked last night!

    Thumb up +8

  2. grayscape

    December 19th, 2012

    I understand progs hate the unborn….but why 5-6 yrolds? Why can’t children be defended? Why do progs want all children to be vulnerable to slaughter?

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +15

  3. BigFurHat

    December 19th, 2012

    Because Piers Nipple thinks that if the “high capacity magazine” goes away, so does gun violence – because a deranged guy with a satchel of fully loaded service revolvers can’t kill a school full of defenseless people in a “gun free zone.”

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +17

  4. jeckelmyhyde

    December 19th, 2012

    Arguing with this foriegn twit about American contitutionalism is equivelent to surrendering our sovereignty over to the U.N…….Oooops we have been doing that for years.

    Thumb up +8

  5. Dr Tar

    December 19th, 2012

    Wow, a case study in ad hominem attack. That was ugly and stupid and it makes CNN that much less relevant.

    They better get rid of this idiot before he complete drives their ratings down to MSNBC levels.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +10

  6. John F.

    December 19th, 2012

    Oh how Piers struggles to make himself relevant.

    Thumb up +9

  7. Dianne

    December 19th, 2012

    I wish Pieceofshit Moron would go back to his own country that he helped F-UP. Why isn’t he living in Europe? Hasn’t his ilk screwed up enough societies? People like this F up their own back yard and then move on to F up someone else’s.

    After seeing how this guy operates when he was on Celebrity Apprentice has given me a huge dislike for this piece of crap. A narcissistic liar, egomaniac and hypocrit. The whole evil package.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +10

  8. CrustyB

    December 19th, 2012

    Piers has no concept of freedom whatsoever. “Let Americans buy these…” Yes, we let people buy merchandise here because we respect freedom. It’s not a just government’s role to permit or prohibit people from rightful ownership of something.

    I would rather live as a free man with a one in a million chance of being shot to death than live as a slave with a one in million chance of being stabbed to death.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +14

  9. Dadof3

    December 19th, 2012

    Crusty, I guarantee if guns are gone the chance of being stabbed will be a lot more frequent than one-in-a-million.

    Britain even clamped down on knives since the violence escalated after the gun ban over there.

    It went even further – you can’t even fight back without being considered worse than the perpetrator.

    Thumb up +7

  10. IMPEACH Obama

    December 19th, 2012

    “The Left Doesn’t Understand Issue is Morals, Not Guns”
    DECEMBER 18, 2012 12:00 A.M.
    Conscience, Not Guns. We no longer teach right and wrong.
    By Dennis Prager

    From the moment Americans learned of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre last Friday, the entire Left — editorialists, columnists, broadcasters, politicians — used the occasion to promote one idea: gun control.

    For the Left, the primary reason for just about all American gun murders is the availability of guns.

    I have no interest in debating gun control here. I only wish to ask the Left one question: We have a massive system of drug control laws. Yet, the Left is the first to argue that the war on drugs has been a failure. And whether or not one deems it a failure, the war on drugs surely hasn’t prevented tens of millions of Americans, including teenagers, from obtaining drugs illegally. Why, then, does the Left believe that a war on guns would be any more effective than the war on drugs?

    That question aside, what matters most here is the Left’s preoccupation with guns as the root of the murder problem in America.

    It explains a great deal about the Left’s worldview. The moral values and the conscience of nations as well as individuals seem to play almost no role in the Left’s understanding of human behavior. …..


    Thumb up +4

  11. even steven

    December 19th, 2012

    And this snaggle-toothed, British halfwit is in this country for what reason?

    Thumb up +5

  12. Dadof3

    December 19th, 2012

    I would like to see one experiential excercise for these twit Brits to go through.

    They are in a “Start” room with the rules in front of them.

    There are two doors that honestly lead to either an area with everyone having guns or an area with no one having guns.

    Regardless of the makeup of the races, gang affiliations, genders, etc. of either – one set has guns the other a certainty there are no guns.

    The rules: Pick a door knowing full well about the guns-no guns status. You have the option of having a gun in the area that allows them but you don’t have to have a gun with either choice.

    You may re-enter the safe zone of the start room at any time to rethink things.

    The rules on the other side of the doors? No rules except that one side has no guns at all.

    Either area may have robbers, rapists, or a just crazy enough person who likes to see people bleed.

    In the no-gun area – Everyone has beem patted down and wanded for firearms but they can have whatever else they want.

    You have to pick a door because life is like that – playing like you’re Howard Hughes and becoming a recluse is not an option for us commoners.

    Now… which one do you feel safer in?

    Take your time. Be sure. Test either side as long as you need to to come to a learned decision because that is your world of choice.

    I would choose armed amongst armed others. I’m quite sure we’ll be more polite but the ones that would cause trouble would be taken out and the dangerous ones will be thinned out at some point.

    The other side? good luck with that. Brute force will rule there because who would stop them except for more brute force?

    In the land of no guns – bullies rule. Always have.

    Thumb up +4

  13. Xavier

    December 19th, 2012

    We’ve all been through this before so I’ll keep it short.

    1) Gun control laws don’t prevent killings. (Chicago, Newtown)

    2) Gun Free Zones don’t protect anyone. (Newtown, Denver)

    3) The Second Amendment isn’t about hunting or self-protection.

    4) The media is controlling and diverting the conversation to avoid recrimination.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +11

  14. phuqpeirs morganistan

    December 19th, 2012

    #MyJihad – is to talk shit about and steel all the gunss from idiot american so they can’t defend themselves from thugs in their country (Wash DC)or any where in the world so that alllahAHAHAHAH willing the real men of musloid faith can EASILY take the country from the idiot americans and impose sharia all over the world

    that’s MY jihad – what’s yours???





    Thumb up +3

  15. Bad Brad

    December 19th, 2012

    I’d like to deliver the big Bad Brad smack down on that condescending piece a shit. The guy can piss me off like no other. The Colorado movie theater incident and this school shooting were clearly mental health issues. Probably spurred on by this depressing economy our fearless leader has created.

    Thumb up +6

  16. Billy Fuster

    December 19th, 2012

    Morgan vs. Pratt = .22 revolver vs. AR-57.

    Thumb up +2

  17. Stranded in Sonoma

    December 19th, 2012

    Let’s ban 32oz sodas because no one would think to refill a 16oz drink.

    Let’s ban high capacity magazines because no shooter will think to carry an extra one or two.


    Thumb up +7

  18. sandybanks

    December 19th, 2012

    And while we’re banning, let’s get rid of tuna sandwiches


    Thumb up +2

  19. fullcirclethinker

    December 19th, 2012

    First, I am sure Mr. Morgan (I’m attempting to remain civilized here) doesn’t go anywhere in public without security protection. Which includes his bodyguards carrying.

    Second, he only proves the point once again should his ilk prevail: “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.”

    Twit!! (Oops. Fell off the civility wagon!)

    Thumb up +2

  20. fullcirclethinker

    December 19th, 2012


    I went to my local gun shop last Wednesday to weigh out the cost of personal protection in the form of a Ruger .380. My son, on the other hand, ‘pulled the trigger’ so to speak and ordered his handgun right then and there.

    They called this morning to let us know that his handgun was in. Unfortunately, when I told him I was also coming in to purchase the Ruger, he informed me that he was out of them! I had to put my name on a waiting list.

    Hope it shows up soon…..

    Thumb up +3

  21. MNP

    December 19th, 2012

    Peirs sure makes it easy to realy fucking hate him.

    Thumb up +1

  22. grayscape

    December 19th, 2012

    Think I’m kidding about progtards happy creaming their pants over the Sandy Hook slaughter?


    This sick fuck should be arrested – probably has a dungeon full of kids.

    Thumb up +2

  23. eternal cracker p

    December 19th, 2012

    going on day 40 for an “up to 30 day” wait on my foid card. check never cashed. WTF>>>>>

    Thumb up +1

  24. Nutjob

    December 19th, 2012

    Must sicken Piers to know independant freedom thinking individuals left his homeland because of tyrants and corruption, and now the twit is wanting america to go back to a king tyrant and its oppressive rule where only bandits and the corrupt live well and successfully.

    Go back to you’re culturally integrated fucked up country you asswipe, but next time you get taken over from being complacent….don’t ask for help from a country that believes in arms, rights, and guns to save your dumbass.

    Thumb up 0