» News

Wall of Morons

The Darkside of iOwnTheWorld - by - December 15, 2012 - 11:27 America/New_York - 58 Comments

Today’s sticky post will be used to regale you with a cornucopia of morons who are actively calling for the government to confiscate guns.

“Gun control is our only road to freedom.” – Rashida Jones

Rochelle Riley – I wanted {Obama} to stand before the press the way fictional President Andrew Shepherd did at the end of Rob Reiner’s 1995 film “The American President” and say enough is enough and that he was going to get the guns…

(I wanted Obama to stand before the press like the non-fictional character Ronald Reagan. But, hey, we can’t always get what we want.)

Michael Moore – “Too soon to speak out about a gun-crazy nation? No, too late,” wrote “Bowling for Columbine filmmaker Michael Moore. “At least THIRTY-ONE school shootings since Columbine.”

(Michael is calling for a ban on all blubber piercing bullets)

“No more weasly words of ‘comfort’ Mr. President. This is the latest, and worst, gun outrage on your watch. Time to act,” wrote CNN host Piers Morgan.

(Careful, Piers. The solution might be to round up all the crazy people.)
“gun control is no longer debatable — it’s not a ‘conversation’ — It’s a moral mandate.” – Mia Farrow

(Tell me more about what is no longer debatable, Adolf.)
“We have heard all the rhetoric before. What we have not seen is leadership – not from the White House and not from Congress. That must end today. This is a national tragedy and it demands a national response.” – Mike Bloomberg

(Is he talking about sugary drinks? I can’t tell.)

 

The National Rifle Association should pay for mental health, just like the tobacco companies pay for folk who got lung cancer. They need to step up to their responsibilities. Rights need to be balanced by responsibilities.

-Washington Post Commenter
Arkletten

(You’re first in line, Arky. Medication time. Medication time.)

 

» 58 Comments

  1. MAJMike

    December 15th, 2012

    Soooo, they want to punish those who had no connection to this or any other vile crime of violence for the terrible incident.

    If this is their logic, then why can’t Eric Holder be blamed for the deaths resulting from “Fast and Furious”?

    Ted Kennedy killed more people than I.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +45

     
  2. wildman

    December 15th, 2012

    Morons no, Hypocrites Yes. they wring their hands and wail for more control all the while their security guards protect them. God i hate them all.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +46

     
  3. KF

    December 15th, 2012

    I give up trying to reason with indoctrinated, dense, brain-dead liberals (but I repeat myself). Sadly that means most of my family who are from New England and Philadelphia areas. It’s all emotional reactions and zero logic. They never had a proper conscience formation or were trained in logical thought. Gramsci was an evil genius.

    I thank God for the few teachers and other people who helped wake me the heck up. The curtain is falling on Western civilization and this isn’t going to be very much fun in the near future.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +22

     
  4. Name Redacted

    December 15th, 2012

    Notice how the mass shootings started after they gave “rights” to the psychos and closed all the mental institutions? Of course, these days, if they reopened the mental institutions and regained the right to commit people against their will, they’d round up all the “political dissenters” …ahem…

    We can’t trust the government to do the right thing anymore.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +43

     
  5. Name Redacted

    December 15th, 2012

    @wildman – good point.

    The first guns get taken away from Michael Moore’s security detail.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +24

     
  6. Jack Daniels

    December 15th, 2012

    If this is not a call to arms, I don’t know what is.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +25

     
  7. Goldenfoxx

    December 15th, 2012

    It’s much easier to go after the guns than it is to commit a crazy person. The PTB can’t get all the guns no matter how much they try. There’s too many guns and ammo–good luck trying to get them. Why don’t they do something about crazy people? The Aurora shooter was identified months before his rampage that he was nuts. All the signs were there yet nothing was done about him. These shootings can not be stopped by crazies. Be mindful of your surroundings and be prepared to act.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +20

     
  8. Menderman

    December 15th, 2012

     
  9. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good” (George Washington)

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +16

     
  10. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    “The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” — (Thomas Jefferson)

    “And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms….The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants” (Thomas Jefferson)

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +15

     
  11. grayscape

    December 15th, 2012

    Round ‘em all up – sort of like Kristalnacht right? Fucking Democrat NAZIS.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +21

     
  12. Jozan

    December 15th, 2012

    Come and get’em

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +12

     
  13. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    “Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people.” (Aristotle)

    “The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military. The hired servants of our rulers. Only the government-and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws.” (Edward Abbey, “The Right to Arms,” Abbey’s Road [New York, 1979])

    “To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege.” [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +13

     
  14. Xavier

    December 15th, 2012

    O/T but DAMN WHAT TIMING!

    BREAKING: State Department: Ill Hillary Rodham Clinton faints, has concussion, now recovering at home

    Thumb up +9

     
  15. Xavier

    December 15th, 2012

    Probably wiped all her memory regarding Benghazi.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +20

     
  16. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    ” `The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.” [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +14

     
  17. Dagny

    December 15th, 2012

    May God bless Victoria Soto: “she threw herself in front of her students to save them.”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2248574/Sandy-Hook-shooting-The-child-victims-gunned-Adam-Lanza-school-Connecticut.html

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +20

     
  18. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    “The provision in the Constitution granting the right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff.” [People vs. Zerillo, 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)]

    “The maintenance of the right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions.” [State vs. Kerner, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)]

    “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the “high powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.’ A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.” [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]

    Thumb up +6

     
  19. Nutjob

    December 15th, 2012

    I’ll give up my guns Michael Smore when you give up all of your money, lose weight and start eating healthy you fat hippocritical pig.

    Thumb up +5

     
  20. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    The Dick Act of 1902
    Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, June 28, 1902. Congressional Record, House, pages 7706-7713 and 321-353, 7594-7595. Also known as the Dick Act of 1902, written by Representative Dick, passed by Congress on June 30, 1902.

    The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

    The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

    The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
    Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”

    The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

    During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

    The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

    Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: “The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States.” In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, “that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it.”

    “This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power.”

    The Honorable William Gordon
    Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917

    “Be it enacted that the militia shall consist of every able-bodied male citizen, respective of States, Territories, and the District of Columbia and every able-bodied male of foreign birth who has declared his intention to become a citizen, who is more than 18 and less than 45 years of age, shall be divided into three classes; the organized militia, to be known as The National Guard of the State, Territory or District of Columbia, or by such other designations by the laws of the respective States or Territories, as may be given by the laws of the respective States or Territories, the national voluntary reserve as provided in this act, and the remainder to be known as the reserve militia.”

    The Militia Act and the revised Militia Act (the Dick Act), make it quite clear that all men between the ages of 18 and 45 are the (unorganized) militia with an absolute right to keep and bear Arms under the Article II of the Bill of Rights, of whatever type; automatic or semi-automatic, regardless of size, magazine capacity, barrel length or caliber/gauge in any quantity they may deem necessary along with any amount of ammunition they may determine from time to time.

    “The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report”, of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee; Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, February 1982. Orrin Hatch, Chairman.
    “That the National Guard is not the “Militia” referred to in the Second Amendment is even clearer today. Congress has organized the National Guard under its power to “raise and support armies”, and not its power to “Provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia.” This Congress chose to do so in the interest of organizing reserve military units which were not limited in deployment by the strictures of our power over Constitutional militia, which can be called forth only “to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel invasions.” The modern National Guard was specifically intended to avoid status as the Constitutional militia, a distinction recognized by Title 10 United States Code 311 (a).”

    “The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commenter and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.”

    The Second Amendment right to keep and bear Arms, therefore, is a right of the individual citizen to privately possess and carry in a peaceful manner firearms and similar arms. Such an individual rights interpretation is in full accord with the history of the right to keep and bear arms previously discussed…It accurately reflects the majority of proposals that lead up to the Bill of Rights itself.

    NOW, THEREFORE, all existing or future so-called “gun and/or ammunition laws”, of whatever name or form under “color of law”, whether Federal, Federal Agency, Pseudo Federal Agency, State, County or Municipal that infringes, abridges or restricts in any manner, the God given, unalienable, indefeasible, Constitutional right of Citizens to keep and bear Arms peaceably, openly or concealed, for their defense of life, liberty, and property are prima facie violations of Article 1, Sec. 9, Part 3; Article 6, Part 2; and Amendments I, II, IV, IX, and X of the Constitution for the United States of America; Article 2; Sec. 1, Sec. 2, Sec. 4, Sec. 5, Sec. 27, and Sec. 29 of the Constitution for the State of Arkansas; and the Dick Act of 1902, and are NO LAW, ab initio, ultra vires, of no force and effect, incumbent upon no one to obey or any court to enforce.

    Thumb up +8

     
  21. Nutjob

    December 15th, 2012

    No more weasly words of ‘comfort’ Mr. President. This is the latest, and worst, gun outrage on your watch. Time to act,” wrote CNN host Piers Morgan.

    Great, are you calling on hollywood to stop glorifying unadulterated killings without emotions in their movies?
    Or Jamies Foxx to retract his elation of killing all of the white people in his movies?

    Killing is killing, whether it be kids, adults, or old people, stop endorsing the splitting of hairs you freaking media Goebbels.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +18

     
  22. MNP

    December 15th, 2012

    Thomas Jefferson

    The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

    Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now.

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.

    “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (Quoting Cesare Beccaria)

    The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.

    Thumb up +8

     
  23. old_oaks

    December 15th, 2012

    All any of this means is that I will need to eat Raman Noodles over the holidays, forgo the kid’s gifts and ramp up the plans I already had to purchase a couple more firearms. First one will be an AK-47!

    Funny, I bought a handgun a couple years ago SOLELY on the fact that it had a decal on the included case that says; “Not Legal In California And W/High Capacity Magazine”

    I couldn’t part with my money fast enough when I saw that decal… The gun is pretty awesome too!

    Thumb up +3

     
  24. Diann

    December 15th, 2012

    Leave it to the Liberals who run around flapping their arms like wet hens demanding that we treat a SYMPTOM of our cultural rot rather than doing something about our cultural rot.

    Thumb up +9

     
  25. cfm990

    December 15th, 2012

    So, when they come for the guns, who’s guns will they get? The legally purchased ones that have a paper trail. The ones owned by law abiding citizens.
    Who’s guns will be overlooked? Those owned by the criminals.
    Public safety is not the issue. An easily enslaved populace is.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +18

     
  26. KF

    December 15th, 2012

    “Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace… Crisis is the rallying cry of the tyrant.” James Madison

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +11

     
  27. Plain Jane

    December 15th, 2012

    Some NPR talk show host (Sparks) just probably hit the nail on the head. He said if the gov doesn’t get the guns, the “free” market will.

    He said that just like with smokers not being hired, employers will not hire if you own a gun. It could start with schools.

    He didn’t say it, but it occurs to me that the insurance companies will play a big part in this.

    Thumb up +3

     
  28. LyleLovett666

    December 15th, 2012

    So if someone on pcp goes nuts and eats someones face off it’s a clear sign that we need to legalize drugs.If someone goes nuts and does something terrible with a gun we need to make guns illegal.Only a libtard can think this way.

    Thumb up +8

     
  29. old_oaks

    December 15th, 2012

    Guns? Oh you mean the guns I privately sold out of state?

    The purchasing paper trail only goes so far, the NCIS check is just that, a background check, it doesn’t register anything. Even here in Illinois, guns are not registered, we do have a Firearm Owner’s Identification program but it does not register guns!

    I can sell a gun to anyone of legal age who is not otherwise prohibited from owning a gun in their jurisdiction. If I sell to another Illinois resident, I must document buyer’s FOID and gun serial numbers. However if I sell to someone in Texas while I am physically in Texas, I need not maintain any record.

    Thumb up +4

     
  30. Plain Jane

    December 15th, 2012

    Oh, the leftist host also said that Reagan eliminated funding for the mental institutions.

    I don’t think it happened under Reagan, I learned in one of my psych classes that it occurred under Kennedy. Anybody know for sure?

    Thumb up +2

     
  31. old_oaks

    December 15th, 2012

    Oh, and the private sale documents are only good/required to be kept for 10 years.

    Thumb up +2

     
  32. Tabby

    December 15th, 2012

    BIGGEST IDIOTS! Add these morons to the wall! (SUCH Dumbass Libotards!!)

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-grabbers-call-for-murder-of-nra-president-supporters-in-wake-of-mass-shooting.html

    Thumb up +3

     
  33. Tabby

    December 15th, 2012

    @ Plain Jane; your answer is in this article.. It was the ACLU suing states that caused it to be defunded starting in the 50′s. In the 80′s they lost all fed. funding so you can thank the left! As usual it’s never their fault in their own minds.

    http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2012/12/15/rampage-shootings-its-the-moral-decay-of-society-not-guns-n1467549/page/full/

    Thumb up +3

     
  34. factslady

    December 15th, 2012

    Mandate all adults own and carry a gun. Problem solved.

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +11

     
  35. Diann

    December 15th, 2012

    “Is he talking about sugary drinks? I can’t tell”

    LOL! You are in rare form today, Fur, and that’s saying something.

    Thumb up +4

     
  36. RosalindJ

    December 15th, 2012

    Plain Jane, At most, he returned the right and responsibilities to the states. Even the shaky wikipedia doesn’t go there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinstitutionalisation

    Then there’s this, paras 6-9: http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/madness-deinstitutionalization-murder

    The Civil Rights Act was used in no small measure as well.

    Thumb up +3

     
  37. Mr.Gates

    December 15th, 2012

    There’s also the issue of private property rights. The government can’t just come take your legally purchased belongings. Certainly not without encountering strong resistance.

    Right about now would be a good time to legally purchase some more personal belongings.

    Thumb up +5

     
  38. grayscape

    December 15th, 2012

    Ed Shultz is wetting his panties he’s so excited about all the dead children….and the opportunity to kill the US constitution.

    Thumb up +9

     
  39. Stranded in Sonoma

    December 15th, 2012

    How many police officers and other law enforcement officials will no longer see their families when they try to take someone’s gun? Police Chiefs around the country are going to lose good officers and they know it. What happens if 2, 3, or 4 officers die before they finally murder the gun owner? You’ll see a SWAT team at every attempt of confiscation. The officers will soon figure out that the more raids they go on, the higher their odds of dying. After a few deadly raids, officers will start calling in sick or taking vacation. When a police chief loses 5-10 officers, he’ll tell Barack Fucking Obama to drop dead.

    If Oscumbag calls in the military, the only hope we have is that the JCS refuses. SCOTUS has ruled that the military cannot be used for the purposes of posse comitatus. Yes the governor can call out the militia. But how many people in the National Guard or state militia own guns? A lot I’ll bet, and they won’t give them up either. I’m guessing many won’t show up if called on to try to take away guns.

    If it comes down to it and BFO does try to grab our guns, it could be his death knell.

    Thumb up +4

     
  40. grayjohn

    December 15th, 2012

    Fuck the Left Forever.

    Thumb up +8

     
  41. no-mo-obamy

    December 15th, 2012

    Grayjohn

    The left will be fucked when the shit hits the fan.

    That will be the true equalizer, it’s coming, I’m ready, and I can’t wait.

    Thumb up +4

     
  42. Xavier

    December 15th, 2012

    1) Ban retail sales of selected weapons
    2) Buyback program (voluntary turn in)
    3) Purchase records used to identify and seize weapons
    (no buyback if seizure required)
    4) Severe penalties for possession of banned guns

    And as far as Posse Comitatus goes, look up the 80,000 troops trained for domestic urban warfare at Ft. Benning, Ga. Y’all keep referring to the Constitution like it still means something.

    Thumb up +4

     
  43. Bayouwulf

    December 15th, 2012

    LET THEM TRY!
    At least I won’t have to worry apout dying in a hospice bed, weighing 85 pounds, with IVs coming out of me everywhere.
    P-H-U-C-K-T-H-E-M!

    Thumb up +1

     
  44. Rick

    December 15th, 2012

    May God bless Victoria Soto: “she threw herself in front of her students to save them.”

    Dagny, I’d much rather Victoria be alive today after dropping that fecal-matter-that-walks-like-a-man in his tracks.

    In a rational world, that would be the case.

    Thumb up +2

     
  45. Ornery1

    December 15th, 2012

    Piers Morgan can just take his Limey ass home. He should know very well why the US has a second amendment.

    Thumb up +2

     
  46. Ten Megaton

    December 15th, 2012

    When the guns are gone there will still be crazy people. Guns do not cause mental illness Arky. You should know this. You are looney tunes and not a gun around, huh.

    Thumb up +2

     
  47. old_oaks

    December 15th, 2012

    Great! Now The Wun is going to bother the folks of Newtown tomorrow (Sunday) with his motorcade, helicopters and extravagance!

    Thumb up +2

     
  48. Ten Megaton

    December 15th, 2012

    I need to buy an enormous amount of ammo. My “when the SHTF” target list keeps growing.

    Thumb up +3

     
  49. DaveVA

    December 15th, 2012

    Mederman, what was that link? I don’t understand? I want to know.

    Thumb up 0

     
  50. old_oaks

    December 15th, 2012

     
  51. DaveVA

    December 15th, 2012

    Thanks

    Thumb up 0

     
  52. Mohammed's pink swastika

    December 15th, 2012

    You talk tough, but what happened after Katrina when the military came in and took away the guns of private citizens? The people’s guns were taken away and no body said a damn thing. What makes you think that the rest of America is not as soft as the people of New Orleans? My bet is that Americans would rather watch dancing with the stars, than defend their birth right.
    Our Government is not taking our rights away, we are giving them away. Defend them, or lose them. it’s your choice.

    Thumb up +1

     
  53. Anonymous

    December 15th, 2012

    @ Tabby and Rosalind

    Thank you for the info. The left uses everything to push their lies.

    Thumb up +1

     
  54. Plain Jane

    December 15th, 2012

    Oops, Anonymous is me.

    Thumb up +1

     
  55. Jorel Lives!

    December 15th, 2012

    I all a thumbs up for an issue so hot this needs to be said:

    Why should you or I give up whatever weapons we possess, when the blacks want a race war to kill all of us, the Hispanics want La Raza and would love to put us all six feet under, and then there’s our beloved government with its stormtroopers and FEMA camps–not to mention most of the world’s population would love to come here and do what? That’s right: kill us all for the land and everything else we have.

    When they kick the door down, take as many as you can out, and if it’s hopeless, do what you have to do–better yet, don’t do what you have to do, keep shooting till they blow you away.

    Thumb up +3

     
  56. Plain Jane

    December 15th, 2012

    Some of the so-called conservatives are ready to give up my second amendment.

    These pseudo conservatives are crying about the event and believing the b.s. for gun control.

    I don’t know if I’m just a hard-*ss, but I dealt with death of human beings as a sidewalk counselor from 1986 to 1993 outside the abortion clinic once a month and from there point on, 5 times a month for 10 years.

    I teared up a tad the first few times I sidewalk counseled but was able to take it to the adoration chapel or to church and put it in God’s Hands after I left PP.

    I knew the devastation that would take over the mother, father and future or existing siblings. Virtually everyone involved changes to one degree or another after the killing of their child or sibling.

    Dang. That PP did between 5-20 per day that they were scheduled to kill.

    Thumb up +2

     
  57. KF

    December 15th, 2012

    God bless you Jane. IMHO the “plain” moniker probabky doesn’t suit you, but humility is a virtue.

    Almost all of these politicians have no principles. The story never changes.

    Psalm 117:8 It is good to confide in the Lord, rather than to have confidence in man.
    9 It is good to trust in the Lord, rather than to trust in princes

    Not only will our “princes” not save us, I doubt most of them will even try.

    Thumb up +2

     
  58. Plain Jane

    December 16th, 2012

    KF, thank you for posting that psalm. I needed that just now.

    Thumb up 0