» News
Is New York Times Hiding Its CEO’s Role in Sex Abuse Cover-Up?
Well, it’s come to this. The New York Times is covering for its new CEO, who may have covered for a serial pedophile. Who covered for another serial pedophile.
In the late 1990s, Paul Francis Gadd — better known as Gary Glitter, the British Elvis — was exposed as a pedophile and fled the country on his sailboat. He sailed to Cambodia, continued his sexual abuse of children, and was deported to Vietnam, where he again resumed it, and was again deported.
In the early 1990s, radio and TV personality Jimmy Savile had been knighted by both Queen Elizabeth and Pope John Paul II for his humanitarian work, which included visiting orphanages and working to uplift children. It was like knighting Howard Stern, but the British had seen nothing yet. When Glitter returned to London in disgrace, Sir Jimmy aggressively defended him, stating of the police:
They went into the hard drive, saw all these dodgy pictures and told the police and the police then “Oh we’ve got a famous person. … Oh my goodness, yeah we’ll have them.” But Gary has not sold ‘em, has not tried to sell ‘em, not tried to show them in public or anything like that. It were for his own gratification. Whether it was right or wrong is, of course, it’s up to him as a person. But they didn’t do anything wrong but they are then demonized. If you said to that copper, what’s Gary Glitter done wrong? Well nothing really. He’s just sat at home watching dodgy films.
even steven
October 28th, 2012
Somewhere a child was abused, and the abuse was filmed, so sick creeps like Gary Glitter could watch. The “he wasn’t hurting anyone” ia BS. He’s part of the mix and guilty as hell.
even steven
October 28th, 2012
…is…
Chuck U Farley
October 28th, 2012
What the crap? We all know that the Left is the most immoral, perverted bunch of slime that crawled from the primordial ooze in epochs.
Why is this a surprise? They’re all sticking there collective tongues in every orifice available. Permissible or non-permissible.
Debbie
October 28th, 2012
I remember Jimmy Savile from the 70′s and knew he had a screw loose.
Tony R
October 29th, 2012
If you watch child porn, you are guilty of child abuse. Period.
TED JUSANT
October 29th, 2012
At last some one on the out side looking in can see that there is wrong done , and yet it is only to himself that he did wrong. I do not condone what he has done ,but for him to get these pictures /photos, some one must have taken them ,have they been arrested, are they in the tabloids for doing these things ,NO, its only the easy pickings again, If countries like TAILAND did not let under age girls PROSTITUTE them selves,
then there would be no crime.