iOwnTheWorld.com

Don’t tell Mona.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P0jSSLleGiY
.

+4

Who is that monster in the pink coat?

+5

Group B needs their own Group STFU and Group NRA.

+6

ME is on twitter as we speak–at least she was 2 minutes ago. Maybe go over and load her down with some lessons on what free speech really means.

+6

I’ll say what I want. Who cares what group you’re in.

+4

MONA OCCUPIES NYC SUBWAY

@mcnorman, great video. Expression vis-à-vis vandalism, in America in 2012 got Mona arrested. With the entire episode recorded, should she hire an attorney, unless CAIR picks up the tab, she’ll be forkin’ over the moolah, at least for the property damage to the subway as well as the other lady’s clothing. In Egypt, they’re certainly stricter, especially to women.

ROMNEY | RYAN | 2012!

+5

The ads have been hugely successful. The controversy and vandalism has lured the MSM into providing what is essentially free prime time television advertising, which would have been cost prohibitive to purchase directly. This has allowed the ads to reach an immense basically captive audience at no extra cost. Given the fact that recent polls show over 80% of the public thinks the media is biased, the pro-jihad anti-free speech narrative that the MSM is promoting may not be what viewers take away as the message.

As for ABCD, it’s just proof of the ‘right now’ liberal hypocrisy that supports government control and Executive Orders, as long as they’re to the left’s benefit. They’re the American version of the Egyptians who voted themselves into enslavement. They don’t have the foresight to see that the laws and freedoms they want modified are the very things which allow and protect the rights that the left holds dearest: freedom of expression* and freedom of assembly.

*yeah I know that’s not a right but the left thinks it is.

On a side note, Ann Barnhardt mentioned something today that I absolutely believe: the MSM will give, or already has given, Barry the debate questions. We should pay very close attention to what he says between now and the election on subjects likely to be in the debate, particularly when he ad libs. You might hear it again, word for word, on debate night.

+9

Xavier: I don’t think it matters if he already has the debate questions. The Romney camp can probably guess with a certain amount of certainty what the questions are going to be. Here’s the trick for Jug ears. Defend your record. I’ve been watching Romney’s interviews. He’s getting damn good.

+6

Discussion is forbidden by the First Amendment!

Salve

0

Here my take on the problem:

Group “C” is equal to group “A”.

Group “M” spends all of their spare time plotting and planning how to take over and destroy group “A” and all groups other than “M”.

Group “A” makes no plans for defense, ignores the fact that group “M” is planning to murder them, and goes so far as to say that group “M” is the most peaceful group in all the world.

Group “B” is well aware of the dangerous threat posed by group “M”, so group “B” is well armed and ready.

Group “A” and group “C” do not deserve protection from group “B”. So they can just kiss their asses goodbye when the shit hits the fan.

+4

Buy guns

+4

How can Group D be acused of ‘racism’ without that charge being contrary to the stated interpretations of Groups A and C?

If those who kill killers are themselves killers then those who accuse others of being intolerant are themselves intolerant.

But, is being intolerant of intolerance virtue or vice?

Or does it boil down to “Hooray for Me and F**k You!”?

0

GO GELLER or GO HOME !!

+1