iOwnTheWorld.com

A hot water bottle?

0

How about a piss obama – and btw, piss does sound like peace…

+1

Somewhere in the darkest recesses of planet Earth some mussie is inspired by your art to uulate all over themselves.

+6

Should be a WHOOPIE CUSHION!

+2

“Why don’t you come with me, little girl, on a magic douchebag ride…”

+6

AiiiighhhLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLiLi!!!!!!

+8

Just start calling it ‘Piss mohammed’ and tweet it out to the religion of peaceniks around the world.

Hilarity ensues.

+5

Okay that’s an old timey douche bag from the 20th century. heheheheh. Too bad islam is still in the 7th.

+6

Enemas please! Peace be all up and through him. hahahhaa

+3

Hemorrhoid donut!!!

+2

Put him in a turbie twist instead.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8otCcY4BO2c/Tyr3qjb8bLI/AAAAAAAAAhU/jJ33kW_D2pE/s1600/Turbie+Twist+Mud+Mask.jpg

+3

What if we made a “Pig’s Piss Koran”?

+5

The crack in the glass is in the shape of a turban…

+1

…and featuring Ned Beatty as mohammad…

+1

Bugs in the system?

+1

We’ve got a monster thumber in the house – I ain’t saying who, I’m just being nice to her…..

+5

Sissy Hankshaw is that you?

+1

“But soft, let us see how Dame Fortune smiles upon my next commenting adventure!”

(w/apol. to Monty Python)

+4

i think you guys conflate sacred with holy.

0

@Dagny–

It’s a common mistake, made by virtually all dictionaries.

I’d suggest directing your objections to the folks at Merriam-Webster, Oxford, Random House, and Wikipedia, for starters.

+1

the point, Mary, is that folks here can’t understand islam without understanding that Christianity promotes profanation in the name of holiness.

While islam kills, rapes and tortures in the name of what it holds to be sacred.

We need to embrace an ethics of radical profanation.

Nothing is sacred = good.

0

♪I know who the mad thumber is (not me though)!♪

+3

@Dagny–

The point, Dagny, is that your point is rather beside the point.

+2

is it?

I thought it was a powerful way to make it very clear that ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION.

+1

OMG… iOTW has been hacked by the progtardians!!

Noteworthy Comment +1,438

+2

Clyster bag of Satan!

http://kafirtiti.blogspot.com/2010/07/whither-art-thou-charles-martel-thy.html

+4

@Dagny–

When you travel around your elbow to get to your wrist, you may lose a lot of folks along the way. That’s a sincere recommendation.

0

@Jewel–

THAT was an interesting link! Thank you.

0

how do suggest we explain islam is not religion without distinguishing between sacred and holy?

0

@Dagny-
I’m sure you are correct. Discussing the finer points of theology, however, is sort of- well- pedantic.
You don’t really need to know exactly what breed of dog is biting you. You need to get the damn thing off your leg.

JWM

+4

Dagny, I take back my post on the other blog. It’s real easy to explain to them when rig is setting in. They threaten our survival.

+2

@Dagny–

“how do suggest we explain islam is not religion without distinguishing between sacred and holy?”

Not going to do your homework for you, Dagny. You’re obviously intelligent–go back and rework.

However, keep this in mind: your supposed dichotomy of “sacred/holy” is a not just a “finer point of theology”, as jwm puts it–it’s an etymological dead end.

+4

Mary’s scaring me tonight.

+2

@Brad–

What do you mean, “tonight”?

+2

“it’s an etymological dead end”

no it’s not:

sacer is an effect of sanctus (holy, same etymological roots as sanctity).

sacer = hieros

sanctum = hagios

0

no: the only way to distinguish between a satanic cult and Truth is by computing sacer and sanctum.

they promote sacer

we promote sanctum

+1

@Dagny
Pedantic or not- please stick around, and keep it up. We all may learn something in the exchange, and that’s always a good thing.

JWM

+2

you know that a “homo sacer” is someone who can be kill without this being considered a murder, right?

for the muslims, any infidel is homo sacer.

+2

be killed*

0

Dagny, none of that’s gonna mean shit to my 1911. I hate to sound to neanderthal, but what you are defining is not going to carry much weight when your trying to protect you and yours. Troubles coming, form one direction or the other.

+3

@Dagny–

It’s an etymological dead end in English. Which we speak.

Although Latin is incredibly useful on many levels, when two important, often-used words with differing Latin roots have come to mean the same in English, it is a waste of time to struggle against that. (Unless the discussion takes place in academia.) You need to move your argument into the vernacular in order for it to be effective.

Do you want to have a compelling argument or do you want to be “correct” vis-a-vis the original language? Your call.

+3

@Dagny–

“the only way to distinguish between a satanic cult and Truth is by computing sacer and sanctum.”

I beg to differ. The way to distinguish between a satanic cult and Truth is by the action/revelation of the Holy Spirit, and prayer.

0

” The way to distinguish between a satanic cult and Truth is by the action/revelation of the Holy Spirit, and prayer.”

Yes, of course. But I meant: within the sphere of language.

The distinction between sacer and sanctum is active in English as well: sacred and holy.

“To sanctify” refers to holy. Sanctum, sanction, sanctity: it’s the domain the Law.
“To consecrate” refers to sacer.

At one points, it will be extremely important to explain how islam is nothing but an evil cult.

We need to forge powerful concepts.

0

@Dagny–

I fear that your insistence on differentiating between “sacred” and “holy” will have limited impact. Not enough people will be illuminated.

I think it is clear enough to many people that Islam is nothing but an evil cult. Those who don’t understand that will be unlikely to be persuaded by word definitions. (No sarcasm intended at all.)

+3

concepts are autonomous ; they can not be reduced to word definitions.

they belong to thought; they are weapons to affect the brain.

they belong to LOGOS, to Reason.

Beyond words, beyond dictionnaries.

0

Dagny — Your discussion sounds interesting, but it is moot at this point. We are dealing with an existential question — i.e. does the West (read Western values) have the right to exist or not?

Please get out of the ivory tower and into the gritty streets of Realityville.

+3

Dagny,
All you really need to know about islam should have filtered through on 9/11.
You’re welcome.

+7