What is there to disavow in this ad?
They support jihad?
They object to jihadists being called savages?
They object to asking for the support of Israel?
I need for this to be verbalized in a way that I understand. I need to understand how the government can take the unprecedented step of running disclaimers next to this ad while they run no such disclaimers next to Islamic ads speaking about Israeli blood libel.
(The rest is edited. People suggested I put quotes around my sarcasm. But take note, these adjectives and nouns are not from the left, these are from the right. -bfh)
By the way, it was the “batshit, crazy c*nt whore, Atlas Juggs,” that paid to run these ads in San Francisco, which led to a federal court case citing the the 1st amendment right to run them because “Islam was a political entity.” (Got that? Geller accomplished that.) It was the “dumb whore” who won the case against the government. It is the “shrieking harpy” who is now scrambling for money in order to counter the counter ads.
When I asked how she was going to pay for it she said she’d sell something, and that the ad “must be done.”
The “dumb bitch whore” could use a tip jar rattle.