Salon publishes a list of politicians and wonks who they say are enemies of the gay agenda while they themselves are gay. Their conclusion is that this is massive hypocrisy.
I see it another way.
In this piece they detail lots of hedonism, perversion and irresponsibility. Perhaps these people advocate against elevating male homosexuals into prominent roles in society because they know homosexuality very intimately.
Would it be hypocritical for a father who wanders the city streets at night to dissuade his son from doing the same?
Salon’s cavalcade of men who might know exactly why they vote against the LGBT agenda HERE