» News


Home - by - March 19, 2012 - 16:30 America/New_York - 8 Comments

Big Journalism

I’ve been following the story of Michael John Kobulnicky, a reported former tea partier who stands accused of rape:

Lemon Grove resident Michael John Kobulnicky, 50, a leader in the San Diego Tea Party and former regional director of the Southern California Conservative Party, is under arrest for allegedly kidnapping and raping a local woman on Fiesta Island.

“He dragged her out of the car and sexually assaulted her pretty brutally,” San Diego Police Lt. Andra Brown told ECM news partner 10 News in late February, shortly after the February 25 assault occurred.

He is charged with rape, kidnapping, and forcible sex with a foreign object.  Evidence includes surveillance video shot at a local convenience store shortly before the kidnapping occurred.  Kobulnicky is being held without bail pending arraignment on Monday.

Despite media reports, his involvement in the San Diego Tea Party has been forcefully rejected:

What I find fascinating is that the some in the media wish to rush into reporting that a person is a “Tea Party Leader” or otherwise active member without fully vetting the subject whenever there is a potential criminal case.

A simple background check would have found that Kobulnicky essentially took a leave from the “San Diego Tea Party” in January and had neither interacted nor worked with them since that time.  Furthermore,  a fair-minded reporter who was well-informed about “Tea Party” activism would recognize that there are no “Tea Party Leaders”.  Some individuals may proclaim this status; however,  anyone following today’s citizen activism would be astute enough to view such claims with a healthy degree of skepticism.

This is a blatant example of the blatant double standard taken by some journalists.  There have been dozens of brutal rape cases associated with the “Occupy Wall Street” movement.  Specifically,  those crimes have occurred in camps during their designated protest activities.  Yet, many press reports have minimized brutality associated with the dozens of reports that are known.  And the news reports don’t try to paint the suspects as “Occupy Wall Street Leaders.”




  1. Bad Brad

    March 19th, 2012

    Is that person holding the sign the Foreign Object he allegedly had sex with.

    Thumb up +1

  2. Nunya

    March 19th, 2012

    As usual the LSM gets it wrong: the guy is more likely a teabagging infiltrator from SF’s Castro district, not a TEA partyer

    Anything to slander middle class Americans as a group rather than focus on your FAILed commie chocolate-king, right lefties?

    Thumb up +4

  3. Snowball the Sourpuss

    March 19th, 2012

    The money quote: “If a movement is for the people and you ignore the people’s suffering, your movement is a failure.”

    I swear to God, if you could harness the hypocrisy of lefties into energy, you could light up two-thirds of North America and power every single automobile on the roads – PLUS send a crew of astronauts to Mars and back.

    Thumb up +2

  4. TooMuchTime

    March 19th, 2012

    @Snowball the Sourpuss — Don’t forget that the moon landings came after the democrats passed the welfare act in the 60s. Coincidence?

    Thumb up +1

  5. Mad Dawg

    March 19th, 2012

    The LSM will always paint the picture they want.

    !0 years after most of us came back from the Nam, if the LSM could identify the murderer, rapist, thief, etc., as a Nam Vet, they put that in their story.

    Yep, we were/are a bunch of crazies.

    Thumb up +1

  6. cfm990

    March 19th, 2012

    If you have to construct a women’s safe space, your movement is fkd.

    Thumb up +3

  7. old_oaks

    March 19th, 2012

    I’m no rapist and can only speculate as to their inner workings, butt hell an OWS camp is where you’re taking a chance at going to the big house?

    Thumb up 0

  8. old_oaks

    March 19th, 2012

    I’ve seen those women.

    Thumb up +1