From the author of Prepper’s Cookbook and Prepper’s Blueprint (Tess Pennington) comes this thoughtful article on what to consider regarding self-protection during this public health safety situation. No panic, just reasonable considerations and it’s up to you.
A handy dandy site which helps you determine which products you may need are indeed made in the U.S. of A.!
Found at Noisy Room.
Dear wild and crazy dancing Slavophiles, I’m *not* giving ANY description…just CLICK ON THE LINK and enjoy (BYOB).
You know that election this November, and how the GOP might *not* pull it off in the Senate? This guy is clearly trolling, but I thought some of you might like to add your 2 bits.
He also got this screed published over at Townhall (ick!), but I won’t link there…the people defending him all use the Democrats’ “logic”.
Please sign the petition to request Congress to investigate the Southern Poverty Law Center. They are making trouble for more and more patriots around the country.
Six Priciples. Food for thought. Not that the ideas themselves are new, but they are ordered and explained in a nice way.
Found at Happy Acres.
You’ll be nodding your head for quite awhile, so enjoy.
Pre-apologies to Jeff Foxworthy. Found at Zero Hedge.
It’s called “Take No Prisoners”. It makes a nice read and most ideas will not be a surprise to any iOTW reader.
Though I agree with most of it (attack, attack, ATTACK!), his ending recommendation is POISON in my opinion: he says that, in 2016, Tea Party folks *must* stick with the GOP or [insert Chicken Little voice here] “it’s all over”.
BULL: if they offer up YET ANOTHER “moderate” (read: a la moderate muslim RINO), THEN it will be over for us.
It took the Republican Party about 6 years to get on its feet; WE HAVE TO START NOW – either within or, if need be, without the GOP framework.
For your Sunday morning jollies.
If the above link doesn’t work, try this:
The article is titled “The Pope’s War” but that seemed a bit too vague for me.
It suggests that Pope Francis is more of the Rottweiler (in a GOOD sense) than Pope Benedict.
An intriguing opinion piece (would be nice to believe, but there isn’t much evidence presented) I hope you enjoy.
From the RICKpac which made the brief video of dear Attorney General Lehmberg goin’ wild…NOW YOU can have your own souvenir t-shirts.
Well, a cute idea, anyway.
DO YOU LIKE BOB (“what’s next?!”), ADAM CAROLLA, AND SUCH?!?
Well, LOOK AT THIS G*DD*MNED LINK, DAMN IT!!
It will SPEAK TO YOU AT 200 DECIBELS ABOUT WHAT IS WRONG TODAY…
…and give you a bit of a breather.
Found at American Thinker: BUT THEY’RE TOO MUCH OF A PUSSY TO LET YOU LINK TO THEM THAT WAY!!!
As a follow-up to my last bullpen post, here is a very brief, very poingnant note about OUR differences with THEM.
See also “How To Be Fired”, in a less delicate, more obscene manner:
You have to LOVE languages and their use/abuse to watch this 13minute video (Lowll, STAY AWAY).
BUTT: the guy has a way with words, making this entertaining and quite nice.
WORKING LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb0YoRMXIY0#t=236
I LOVE ADS THAT GO BOOM.
You will, too.
Found at Ka Ching!, but link not possible.
When I saw this, my only thought was, “this is perfect for the iOTW folks”. Enjoy.
From Conservative Treehouse/Last Refuge. A very nice series (this is 5 of 5…links to the previous 4 at the link) on
What. Is. Important. In. Life.
(beyond crushing your enemies, having them driven before you, and hearing the lamentations of the women).
Imagine that [during World War II American and British reporters had sent back a steady stream of news stories and photos highlighting the plight of German civilians: photos of ruined homes and apartment blocks, wailing women and children, overwhelmed hospitals and so forth. Suppose, further, that these reporters never mentioned anything about the ugly ideology of Hitler and the Nazis, their genocidal hatred for Jews, their plans for world conquest, their persecution of political opponents, etc.
We would all agree that reporters acting in this way would be guilty of a serious breach of journalistic ethics. They would be actively misleading their audience by telling only a small portion of the truth.