» News

Whitehouse gun ban larger than assault weapons ban.

- by - January 5, 2013 - 20:15 America/New_York - 5 Comments

If you thought the gun control advocates were just going to go for an assault weapon’s ban after Sandy Hook, you are sadly mistaken. This would be stage one for full identification of all gun owners. You know what comes next.

Read full article: Whitehouse gun ban larger than assault weapons ban.

» 5 Comments

  1. Bayouwulf

    January 5th, 2013

    This is coming from the SAME PEOPLE the gave weapons the Mexican drug cartel members.

    Remeber folks, it is they who are violating the Constitution, not us.

    MOLON LABE

    Noteworthy Comment Thumb up +11

     
  2. Bad Brad

    January 5th, 2013

    My kids raved about that movie the Hunger Games. I saw it today on cable. I couldn’t help thinking this society will happen after we give up our guns.

    Thumb up +5

     
  3. really enraged

    January 6th, 2013

    “Give”?

    Thumb up +6

     
  4. Mr.Gates

    January 6th, 2013

    Guns aren’t the problem and they know it. They just simply don’t care.

    If they gave a shit about children or reducing violence they would support stronger sentences for violent offenders; compassionate euthanasia sentence for hammer murderers or other forms of up-close and personal murderers (no more plea bargains) who’s lives are irredeemable, worthless, pointless, and guaranteed to produce more destruction and violence; and eliminate political correctness. When any average person encounters a crazy person, they know it. It’s time to start honoring our natural human instincts and call a crazy, crazy. Stop pretending it’s ok to NOT offend a nut case by leaving them alone until they prove they’re dangerous. Somehow, I think Jared Lee Loughner’s actions were far more insulting and offense than having a public health nurse evaluate him, against his will if need be, would have been. Everybody knew he’s nuts, but GOVERNMENT FAILED to protect the innocent from the sick.

    ALL OF THESE MASS SHOOTINGS WERE ENABLED BY LIBERALISM.

    Thumb up +3

     
  5. Allen James

    January 8th, 2013

    There is no valid reason why anyone except law enforcement officials should own ANY gun capable of holding over 15 rounds plus chamber. Period.
    AND, noone needs an assault rifle. I would appreciate ANYONE offering a valid reason for a private individual owning an assault rifle. There is none.

    Thumb up 0

     

» Leave a Reply